Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by KPTCL Against Order Directing Disbursement of Pension to Retired Employee. Withholding of Pension Without Disciplinary Proceedings or Pension Rules is Arbitrary and Unjustified.

The case involves a retired employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) who superannuated on 31.05.2022. The Corporation with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Stay of Departmental Inquiry Pending Criminal Trial in Cash Shortage Case. Parallel proceedings are permissible as departmental inquiry and criminal trial have different standards of proof and objectives.

The petitioner, Subhash Jina Kamble, was employed as a cashier at Dena Bank's Govandi branch. On 4 January 2013, it was reported that he collected cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Cotton Federation Dispute — Labour Court Order Quashed for Interfering at Show Cause Stage. Show Cause Notice Proposing Punishment Cannot Be Challenged Under MRTU & PULP Act Before Final Order.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 29/02/2010 of the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Enquiry and Non-Payment of Gratuity. Employer cannot initiate disciplinary proceedings after superannuation as no employer-employee relationship exists; gratuity cannot be withheld pending enquiry.

The petitioner, Dhairyasheel A. Jadhav, superannuated from the services of Maharashtra Agro Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. on 31.12.2003. On ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...