Search Results for "delay not attributable"

532 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 532 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns High Court and Tribunal Decisions in Disciplinary Case. Appellant Granted Relief and Consequential Benefits Following Challenge to Penalty Imposed for Alleged Desertion of Family.

The appellant challenged the High Court of Delhi's order dated 14.09.2023, which dismissed his Writ Petition and Review Petition. The case involves di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Condonation of Delay Principles Reiterated. First Appellate Court erred in rejecting application for condonation of delay by applying strict standards instead of liberal approach under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between family members. The plaintiff, Vinay Madhukar Kulkarni, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Service Termination Appeals. Delay of 259 Days Not Sufficiently Explained, Tribunal's Discretion Upheld.

The petitioners were employees of Respondent No.2 Institution and worked at Respondent No.3 College until their termination on 17.04.2012, communicate...