Search Results for "conditional possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "conditional possession"

552 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case: Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applies to Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance When Relief of Permanent Injunction Was Sought in Previous Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff's entitlement to seek specific performance existed at the time of the first suit, and failure to include it bars the second suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 24.01.2007 between M/s Chemplast Cuddalore Vinyls Limited (respondent no.1/original plaintiff) and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale Deed.

4 Aug 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of three agricultural properties. He claimed to have...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

28 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Ejectment Decrees Filed by Tenants — Considers Whether Suits by Auction Purchaser Are Barred by Limitation and Maintainable. Examines Applicability of Limitation Act and Tenancy Principles to Auction Purchaser’s Claim for Possession.

20 Dec 2019

The High Court of Karnataka heard three regular first appeals (RFA Nos. 1926/2013, 1924/2013, and 1925/2013) filed by tenants against decrees of eject...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Proper Consideration of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind to the Definition of 'Conveyance' Under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

5 Aug 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Motwani Builders and M/s. B. Alim Builders, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Improvement Compensation Case — Constructive Res Judicata Not Applicable Due to Liberty Reserved by Earlier Order. The Court held that the claim for compensation under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 is not barred by constructive res judicata because the Supreme Court had expressly kept open the remedy in the earlier proceedings.

5 Feb 2019

The dispute concerns a large tract of land originally belonging to Vengunadu Kovilakam, leased out in 1897 for 75 years. After the lease expired in 19...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Dispute Over Possession of Flats for Redevelopment Not Arbitrable as Members Not Bound by Development Agreement. The court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot be granted against persons who are not parties to the arbitration agreement, and the members of the society were not bound by the arbitration clause in the development agreement.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shri Krishan Sai Development Corporation, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit — Minutes of Meeting Not a Concluded Contract. Court holds that minutes recording discussions and basic terms, without payment or execution of sale deed, do not constitute a concluded contract warranting interim protection under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Oct 2013

The appellant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement for sale of property against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Stamp Duty Order in Seawoods Project Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a development agreement-cum-lease deed executed by CIDCO for a 60-year term is a lease, not a conveyance, and is chargeable under Article 36 of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Larsen and Toubro Ltd and its subsidiary, challenged an order dated 16 July 2011 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (r...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)