Search Results for "commercial execution"

1967 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1967 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Concluded Contract Found. Tender Conditions Required Execution of Formal Agreement, Which Never Occurred.

The appellant, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance against respondent No.1, Majithia Nagar Co-operative Housing Soci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Cross-Appeals in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Interim Relief Sought Under CPC and Commercial Courts Act. The suit concerned enforcement of a Negative Lien Letter and personal guarantees, with the plaintiff bank seeking to restrain alienation of assets.

The case involves cross-appeals arising from a commercial suit filed by Bank of Baroda against Dr. Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty and Dr. Chandrakumari Rag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Contract Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Failure to Frame Issues and Conduct Trial Rendered Decree Unsustainable Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

The present Commercial Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 09/08/2019 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Jalna, in Commercial Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration and Execution Proceedings to Principal District Judge Nagpur by Consent. Parties Agree Not to Raise Objections Under Arbitration Act or Commercial Courts Ordinance, 2015.

The petitioner, M/s. Kandla Cargo Handlers, challenged an order dated 27.6.2018 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Nagpur, which granted ...