Search Results for "closure compensation"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Municipal Council to Comply with Earlier Order and Award Compensation for Demolition of Property Without Notice. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Consider Representation for Compensation Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sri. Karan Singh S. Rajpurohith, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of manda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.2,00,000 for Minor Injured by Rash Driving. The court affirmed the Tribunal's finding of negligence and quantum of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 10.09.2008 passed by the III Additional Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retrenched Workers Seeking Reinstatement and Continuity of Service. Workers of a closed textile mill not entitled to reinstatement as closure was genuine and compensation under Section 25FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was paid.

The petitioners, 42 workers of Kalmeshwar Textile Mills, challenged their retrenchment following the closure of the mill. The mill was closed due to f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Income Assessment Upheld. Tribunal's Award of Rs. 88,46,000/- with 12% Interest Confirmed as Based on Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents (claimants) being the wife, daughter, and mother of the deceased Dilip M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Intervention in Industrial Dispute. Petitioners Not Necessary Parties Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Empress Mills, a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, challenging orders passed in B.I...