High Court of Karnataka Directs Municipal Council to Comply with Earlier Order and Award Compensation for Demolition of Property Without Notice. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Consider Representation for Compensation Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 46
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri. Karan Singh S. Rajpurohith, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, including the City Municipal Council, Hosapete, the Deputy Commissioner of Ballari and Vijayanagar Districts, and the Tahsildar, to comply with an earlier order of this Court in W.P. No. 113542/2019 dated 04.10.2021 and award compensation as sought in his representation dated 01.11.2021. The petitioner's property was allegedly demolished by the municipal authorities without prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The earlier writ petition had resulted in an order directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for compensation. Despite the order, the respondents failed to act, prompting the present petition. The Court, after hearing the parties, observed that the respondents are bound to comply with the earlier order. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.11.2021 and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Compliance with Court Orders - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to comply with an earlier order of this Court in W.P. No. 113542/2019 dated 04.10.2021 and award compensation for demolition of his property without notice - The Court held that the respondents are bound to comply with the earlier order and directed them to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within a specified time frame (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents can be directed to comply with an earlier order of this Court in W.P. No. 113542/2019 dated 04.10.2021 and award compensation to the petitioner for demolition of his property without notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.11.2021 and pass appropriate orders within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus
  • compliance with court orders
  • compensation for illegal demolition
  • natural justice
  • right to hearing before demolition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (09) 11

WP No. 103849 of 2023 (LB-RES)

2023-09-27

M. Nagaprasanna

Smt. V. Vidya Iyer for petitioner; Sri. Shivaraj S. Balloli for R1; Sri. V.S. Kalasurmath, HCGP for R2-R4

Sri. Karan Singh S. Rajpurohith

The City Municipal Council, Hosapete; The Deputy Commissioner, Ballari District; The Deputy Commissioner, Vijayanagar District; The Tahsildar, Hosapete Taluk

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking enforcement of an earlier court order and compensation for demolition of property.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to comply with order in W.P. No. 113542/2019 dated 04.10.2021 and award compensation as per representation dated 01.11.2021.

Filing Reason

Failure of respondents to comply with earlier court order and pay compensation for demolition of petitioner's property without notice.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 04.10.2021 in W.P. No. 113542/2019 directing consideration of petitioner's claim for compensation.

Issues

Whether the respondents can be directed to comply with the earlier order of this Court in W.P. No. 113542/2019 dated 04.10.2021. Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for demolition of his property without notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite the earlier order, respondents have not complied and have not awarded compensation. Respondents contended that they would consider the representation in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents are bound to comply with the earlier order of this Court and must consider the petitioner's representation for compensation in accordance with law within a reasonable time.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus... The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.11.2021 and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P. No. 113542/2019 which was disposed of on 04.10.2021 directing consideration of compensation claim. Subsequently, the petitioner made a representation on 01.11.2021. As no action was taken, the present writ petition was filed on 27.09.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Municipal Council to Comply with Earlier Order and Award Compensation for Demolition of Property Without Notice. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Consider Representation for Compensation Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Sarpanch Election for Lack of Locus Standi and Alternative Remedy. Non-Voters Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, ...