Search Results for "cheque payment"

1842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt and Notice Was Not Properly Served.

The revision petition was filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Process in Cheque Dishonour Case. Jurisdiction for Section 138 NI Act lies where cheque is deposited for collection, not only where drawee bank is located.

The petitioner, Dr. Kiran Laxminarayan Maheshwari, a medical practitioner at Murbad, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Rebut Presumption. Accused's Failure to Enter Witness Box and Lead Evidence Results in Confirmation of Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Amol @ Jolly Shrichand Kungwani, challenging his conviction under Section 138 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Accused Due to Non-Existent Debt and Unrebutted Defence. Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Security for Loan Not Attracting Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Debt Not Legally Enforceable.

The petitioner, Sri Lalji Kesha Vaid, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to External Account Freeze. Dishonour Attributable to Police Investigation Freeze Order, Not Insufficiency of Funds Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Proceedings Unsustainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal petition filed by Petitioners and its directors seeking to quash proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Evidence Insufficient to Establish Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Chikkachowdappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...