Search Results for "bail rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "bail rejection"

600 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 600 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted to Accused in Intimidation and Assault Case Linked to Prior Murder — High Court Failed to Consider Criminal Antecedents and Threat to Witnesses. The Court held that the High Court's order granting bail was cryptic and did not consider the seriousness of the allegations under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 452, 504, 506, 307 IPC and Sections 3, 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, nor the accused's involvement in a connected murder case.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the informant (Mohseen) against an order of the Allahabad High Court granting bail to the accused-respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Bail Application Involving Gaurav Arjun Patil. The Court Rules on Bail Sought Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

15 Apr 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, heard an application for bail filed by Gaurav Arjun Patil against the State o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail by Same Court - Sessions Court Cannot Cancel Its Own Bail Order Under Section 439(2) CrPC. The court held that the Additional Sessions Judge lacked jurisdiction to cancel its own bail order, as only a higher court can exercise such power.

20 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Ravindra s/o Mansingh Jadhav, was granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 10.06.2022 in Criminal Bail Application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

23 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227 and Section 482 CrPC to Quash Anticipatory Bail in Rape and Assault Case; Victim Alleges Police Complicity and Brutality, Seeks Transfer of Investigation to COD.

24 May 2021

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Editor-in-Chief in Abetment to Suicide Case — High Court Erred in Declining Bail Without Prima Facie Evaluation of FIR. Non-Payment of Dues Alone Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC.

27 Nov 2020

The appellant, Arnab Manoranjan Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, was arrested on 4 November 2020 in connection with FIR No. 59 of 2018 registe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority passed order within two days of receiving 287-page material, indicating lack of proper application of mind, and there was unexplained delay of 10 months from the first offence.

27 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Salauddin Imamuddin Ansari, father of the detenu Javed @ Sajan Salauddin Ansari, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Judicial Custody — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedy Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that a preventive detention order cannot be sustained when the detenu is already in custody and the detaining authority fails to consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies such as cancellation of bail.

4 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sagar Prakash Bhosale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 1 June 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Detenu Already in Jail — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider necessity of preventive detention when detenu was already in custody.

7 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Pramod Ashok Pujari, was a detenu under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

12 Dec 2011

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)