Search Results for "attributable"

1414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Director in Minimum Wages Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint Failed to Establish Director Was In-Charge of Company's Business Under Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Making Prosecution Unmaintainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed against Dayle De'Souza, a director of Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., alleging violations of the Minimum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unconstitutional Appointment of Administrator in Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. Appointment of Administrator under Section 55A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1971 without prior dissolution of elected body held illegal and ultra vires.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Bhagwan Shankar Bhalerao, Deepak Laxmandas Sirwani, and Vijay Chahu Patil challenging the appointm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Sesa Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax: Profit from Sale of Slag, a By-product in Pig Iron Manufacture, is Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Sesa Industries Limited, an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed a tax appeal under Section 260-A against the order of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...