Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate"

644 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 644 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute — Arbitration Clause Requires Multiple Arbitrators. The court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitration clause specifying 'arbitrators' in plural and 'one by each party' mandates appointment of multiple arbitrators, not a sole arbitrator.

4 Sep 2013

The case involves an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Mrs. Perin Hoshang Davierwalla and anothe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of ICADR Arbitral Orders in Private Road Concession Dispute. Core issue involves whether arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and ICADR Rules can be overridden by the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.

26 Jul 2026

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 13415 of 2025, challenging the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's judgmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

27 Nov 2019

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Proceedings Under Section 32(2)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Decision to Terminate Proceedings as Unnecessary and Impossible Upheld as Within Jurisdiction.

3 Jul 2023

The Arbitration Petition was filed by Sheil Properties Private Limited (Petitioner) under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Supply Contracts — Failure to Provide Load Port Report Constitutes Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Era International, a partnership firm engaged in importing coal, entered into three sale contracts with the respondent, Aditya Birla G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute Due to Invalid Unilateral Appointment Clause. Clause 56 of the agreement providing for appointment of arbitrator by the Architect, an employee of the respondent, is invalid under Section 12(5) read with Schedule 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Dec 2022

The applicant, M/s. Kay Vee Enterprises, a construction company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of En...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute — Rejects Bias Challenge Based on Non-Disclosure. Failure to disclose by arbitrator does not automatically render award contrary to public policy under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; respondents waived objection by participating in arbitration without raising issue.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the respondents, Avitel Post Studioz Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Interim Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement — Petitioner Granted Relief to Appoint Independent Arbitrator. The Court held that an ex parte interim order passed without hearing the Petitioner and in ignorance of bias objection to the named arbitrator must be recalled, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration under Section 9 and Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, M/s. Nagpur Sical Gupta Road Terminal Limited, a joint venture company, entered into a Concession Agreement dated 20 April 2007 with t...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)