Search Results for "appointment against advertisement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "appointment against advertisement"

1037 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1037 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Without Notice Under MRTP Act and MC Act. Court holds that demolition without prior notice under Section 53 of MRTP Act and Section 260 of MC Act violates principles of natural justice.

15 Jul 2026

The petitioners, residents of Thane and Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Advertisement for Director Post in RIMS, Imphal. Court Holds That High Court Erred in Going Into Validity of Recruitment Rules Without Challenge and in Holding That Non-Notification of Rules Invalidates Advertisement.

17 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common judgment of the High Court of Manipur that quashed an advertisement dated 16.08.2016 invitin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Appointments to Assistant Commercial Tax Officer and Commercial Tax Inspector Posts Made Contrary to Advertised Reservation Break-Up. Writ Petition Challenges Appointments that Filled Reserved Seats with General and OBC Candidates, Allegedly Violating Rights of Scheduled Tribe Candidate.

12 Sep 2018

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Deepak Narayan Gaude, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, against the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Temporary Employees in Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Petitioners, appointed as temporary employees, were terminated without notice; court held that temporary employees have no right to the post and termination in accordance with contract terms is valid.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioners, fifteen individuals, were appointed as temporary employees by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) for a fixed period or unti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Removal of Employees Appointed on Compassionate Grounds Without Following Regular Recruitment Process. The Petitioners, Appointed as Hamals and Clerk-Typists Under a State Government Scheme for Dependents of Retiring Class IV Employees, Argued That Their Long Service of 18 Years Entitled Them to Absorption, While Respondents Contended That the Appointments Were Back-Door Entries in Violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

21 Apr 2017

The judgment pertains to five writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 16th November 2015 by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Temporary Teacher in MEPS Act Case — Appointment to Unrecognized Classes Not Entitled to Probation Benefits. The Court upheld the School Tribunal's finding that the petitioner's temporary appointment to teach unrecognized Standards IX and X did not attract Section 5(1) and (2) of the MEPS Act, and the alleged oral termination was not valid.

13 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Abdul Rafique Abdul Hamid, was initially appointed as an untrained teacher on 3/10/1989 with effect from 5/10/1989. Subsequently, by o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Professors Challenging Exclusion from Director Selection Process in Autonomous College. Internal Candidates Not Entitled to Be Considered if They Do Not Meet Qualifications Prescribed by Board of Governors Under Autonomous Status.

11 May 2012

The petitioners, Prof. Bandu Baburao Meshram and Prof. Abhay Bambole, were professors at Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute (VJTI), an autonomou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Law Officer Group B in Police Department — No Right to Appointment by Mere Participation in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Illegality in Appointment of Respondent No.3 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

8 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Ms. Surekha Ragho Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Age Eligibility for Family Court Judge — Minimum Age of 35 Years Must Be Completed as on the Date of Advertisement. The court held that the condition of minimum age must be satisfied as on the date of advertisement, not on the last date of application, under Section 6 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

3 Dec 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Mayuri Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the administrative decision of the High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition in Service Termination Case — Appointment Was Purely Temporary and Not Approved by Education Officer Under MEPS Act. The Court held that a temporary appointment for a fixed academic year does not confer any right to continue, and termination at the end of the term is valid.

5 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Smt. Meenaxi D/o Narayanrao Kadam, was a qualified graduate with D.Ed. and had worked as an Assistant Teacher at Gurudeo High School, ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)