Search Results for "agricultural landowner"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landowners Challenge MIDC Over Land Classification and Compensation" "Petitioners demand reclassification and enhanced compensation for perennially-irrigated land."

The case involves a writ petition filed by Hiraman Yashwant Kathe and others challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal, Holds Section 84 Not an Alternative to Section 29(1) in Bombay Tenancy Act. Court Rules Invalid Surrender Does Not Entitle Tenant to Summary Eviction Under Section 84, Remedy Lies with Mamlatdar Under Section 29(1).

The dispute arose under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent 1, the landowner, owned two survey numbers in Panchmahals, Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Orders of Surplus Land Determination Under Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. Partition Deed Dated September 6, 1956, Not Affected by Section 32-KK as Amendment Came into Force on October 30, 1956, Not Retroactively.

The case concerned a dispute over the determination of surplus agricultural land under the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...