Search Results for "administrative tribunal"

185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Re-Medical Test for Civil Services Aspirant After Nearly a Decade. In an exceptional ruling, the Supreme Court allows a petitioner a second chance at a medical examination, potentially paving the way for his entry into the Civil Services despite missing the initial re-medical test.

The petitioner applied for the Civil Services Examination 2014 and qualified through all stages, but was declared "temporarily unfit" due to high BMI....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employees for Fraudulent Appointments. High Court's Reversal of Central Administrative Tribunal's Order Overturned, Emphasizing Integrity in Compassionate Appointments and Adherence to Natural Justice Principles

The appeals filed by the Union of India challenge a judgment by the High Court of Calcutta that reversed a Central Administrative Tribunal order and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Goa High Court Rules that Comunidades are Not Public Authorities under RTI Act. Comunidades in Goa are not bound by the RTI Act, 2005; court clarifies their legal status.

The Goa High Court has ruled that Comunidades, traditional village associations in Goa, do not qualify as "public authorities" under the Right to Info...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tribunal Upholds Employee's Right to Voluntary Retirement. High Court affirms Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, granting employee voluntary retirement amidst personal hardship.

The petitioners challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order granting voluntary retirement to the respondent. The respondent, employed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Central Government's Discretion in Voluntary Retirement Case of IPS Officer. Central Government's Authority Affirmed in Assessing Disciplinary Matters and Rejecting Voluntary Retirement Amid Serious Charges

The petitioner, an IPS officer, challenged the Central Government's refusal to accept his voluntary retirement due to pending disciplinary proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Employee Gratuity Payout Deferred Pending Appeal Conclusion. Court rules that gratuity is payable only after final judicial orders, including appeals, are issued under Maharashtra Civil Services Pension Rules.

This case deals with the entitlement of a State Government employee to receive gratuity upon the conclusion of judicial proceedings under Rule 130(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Restores Pension Benefits After 27-Year Increment Mistake. Petitioner secures favorable ruling on pension recalculations and additional benefits after wrongful withdrawal of increments granted for past service.

The petitioner, a Junior Hindi Stenographer, was employed with the Madhya Pradesh Government from 1977 to 1985 and later joined the respondent employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Ruling on Additional Charge of Director, DMER. Petitioner Retains Charge Until Superannuation; Tribunal’s Decision Criticized for Misinterpreting Seniority and Procedure

This writ petition under Article 226 challenges the judgment by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) dated 07/05/2024, which set aside an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Union of India to Appoint Visually Impaired Candidates Against Backlog Vacancies. After years of litigation, the Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure justice for visually impaired candidates denied appointments in the Civil Services Examination 2008.

The case revolves around respondent no.1, a 100% visually impaired individual, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2008 and was denie...