Search Results for "adjournment rejection"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Implead Legal Representatives in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Application Under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC Read With Section 151 CPC Held Maintainable Despite Dismissal of Suit for Default.

The petitioner, Smt. Savithramma (since deceased, represented by her legal representative Sri. R.M. Sudarshan), filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Personal Hearing Notice Due to Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Customs Act, 1962 — Delay of 16 Years in Remand Proceedings Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Right to Speedy Adjudication

The petitioners, M/s. Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, challenged a show cause notice dated 24.09.2003 and a personal hearing notic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Reopening of Evidence in Partition Suit Subject to Costs and Conditions. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of applications for reopening and leading further evidence, directing expeditious disposal.

The case involves a partition suit filed in 2008 by the respondent/plaintiff against her siblings and other family members concerning properties left ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...