Search Results for "additional fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "additional fee"

1900 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1900 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2).

4 Mar 2013

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Dismiss Succession Petition for Non-Payment of Court Fees. Court holds that Section 379(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not require payment of court fees at the time of filing a succession petition under Section 372 of the Act.

12 Jun 2023

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the deceased Deokaranji Bhoot, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Defendants in Suit for Declaration and Injunction, Quashing Trial Court Order to Decide Valuation and Court Fee as Preliminary Issue. Held that issues relating to valuation and court fee are mixed questions of law and fact and must be decided at final stage under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents (plaintiffs), challenged an order da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Court Fee on Market Value in Partition Suit. Valuation Must Be Decided on Plaint Allegations, Not Cross-Examination Admissions, Under Sections 35(1) and 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

17 Jul 2026

The writ petition arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiff (petitioner) against his brother and the legal heirs ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.

27 Jan 2016

The plaintiff, Uday Singh Deshraj Rajput, filed Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court on 11 November 2013 seeking a declaration that he wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Feb 2020

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest Demand on CLIII License Renewal Fee. Excise Department Cannot Levy Interest Without Specific Statutory Provision Under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 or Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953.

21 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Maheshprasad Dwarkadas Jaiswal and Rajeshwar Dwarkadas Jaiswal, are CLIII license holders for a liquor shop at Shahabazar, Aurangabad...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)