Search Results for "Wild Life (Protection) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Wild Life (Protection) Act"

206 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Stone-Crushing Industries' Challenge to Wildlife Sanctuary Notification Due to Procedural Compliance and Environmental Conservation. The Court upheld the notification declaring Kappathagudda Wildlife Sanctuary under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, finding it validly issued after due process and necessary for biodiversity protection, thereby restricting mining in the Eco-Sensitive Zone.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by multiple stone-crushing industries and individuals holding licenses to operate on patta lands near the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Innocent Possession. The court held that the burden under Section 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of forest produce is established, and the applicant failed to rebut the presumption that the teakwood was government property.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Authorization. The court held that the burden of proof under Section 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of timber is established, and the applicant failed to prove lawful possession.

5 Oct 2023

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, on ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Eco-sensitive Zone Case, Upholding NGT's Reliance on Expert Committee Report. The Court affirmed the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction and application of the precautionary principle under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, regarding the Zonal Master Plan 2030 for Mount Abu.

12 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, arising from NGT judgments dated 10 March 2021 and 29 J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revocation of Environmental Clearance for Granite Quarrying Near Bannerghatta National Park. Environmental Clearance Restored as Eco-Sensitive Zone Notification dated 11.03.2020 Limits Mining Prohibition to Notified 100-Meter Zone, Not One-Kilometer Buffer.

12 Jul 2021

The petitioner, owner of patta land in Herandyapanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, was granted a work order on 14.01.2016 under Rule 32(1) of the Kar...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Public Interest Litigation for Rejuvenation of Godavari River Due to Extensive Pollution — Directs Implementation of NEERI Recommendations and Preventive Measures. Pollution of Godavari River by untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and religious activities violates public trust doctrine and Article 51A(g); preventive steps ordered under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

18 Dec 2018

This public interest litigation was filed by citizens of Nashik seeking directions to clean and prevent pollution of river Godavari, the second longes...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wildlife Case Due to Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Police Constable Not a Competent Officer to Lodge Complaint Under Sections 9, 39, 50, 51 of the Act.

14 Jul 2015

The petitioners, Mannu Kaduba Gavane and Sagar Mannu Gavane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking qua...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Reference Court's Valuation of Agricultural Land. Court holds that land and trees cannot be valued separately for agricultural land, and grants interest under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5 Apr 2010

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the appellants, who were landowners, against the judgment and order of the Reference Court dated 31 July 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Environmental Protection in Mahabaleshwar and Panchgani Hill Stations. The matter involved various municipal councils, private owners, and regulatory bodies, but the final outcome and reasoning are not provided in the extracted text.

19 Oct 2006

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)