Search Results for "Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Land Claim in Urban Land Ceiling Dispute, Sets Aside Allotment to Newspaper Publication. Court Declares Survey No. 19/P as Actual Survey No. 129/45/D Under Article 142, Rejecting Government's Compliance Report.

The Supreme Court disposed of Miscellaneous Applications arising from a long-standing land dispute concerning Survey No. 129/45/D in Jubilee Hills, Hy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal — Possession Not Taken, Land Vests Back in Petitioners. Repeal Act of 1999 Applies as Possession Was Not Taken Under Section 10(5) of the 1976 Act Before Repeal.

The petitioners, Gopalrao Shiva Ikhankar and others, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.

The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Surplus Land Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Petitioners' claim for housing scheme under Section 20 rejected as they failed to comply with statutory requirements and the land was already allotted to a trust.

The petitioners, legal representatives of original landowners, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...