Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT's Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Revised Income Tax Returns. Non-Speaking Order and Violation of Natural Justice Led to Remand for Fresh Consideration Under Section 119 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd., a company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

The petitioner, Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Mining Auction Dispute Due to Arbitrary Forfeiture of Earnest Money. Writ Jurisdiction Exercised Under Article 226 of the Constitution as Government Action Was Unreasonable and Facts Were Undisputed, Directing Refund of Forfeited Amount.

The dispute arose from a mining auction conducted by the Directorate of Mining, Industries and Commerce Department, Chandigarh, Punjab. The appellant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Against CGRF Interest Order in Tariff Refund Dispute. Interest on Differential Tariff Amount Not Payable Absent Specific Provision in Regulations or Agreement.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Consumer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...