Search Results for "Tribunals Reforms Act"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities in Pond Land Dispute. High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 by Reappreciating Evidence Without Perversity.

The dispute pertains to Khasra No.103 (formerly Khasra No.84) in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. In 1970, the land was recorded as 'Johad (Pond)' in revenue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Tribunal Order Due to Inordinate Delay of 31 Years. Unexplained Laches Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Barred Discretionary Relief.

The petitioners, Smt. Ashabee and Smt. Ramzan Bee @ Khaja Bee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010100302020_1

The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010026042017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...