Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights (TDR)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Transferable Development Rights (TDR)"

112 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Land Owner's Right to Insist on Acquisition under Section 126 MRTP Act After Town Planning Scheme Reservation. The Court frames the legal issue regarding the interrelationship between Chapters V and VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 in the context of land reserved for public purposes.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute regarding a plot of land reserved for Municipal Office in a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and To...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.

9 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition Imposing 90% Backward Class Membership in Redevelopment of PWR 219 Scheme Land — Condition Held Unreasonable and Without Legal Basis Under Article 226. The court struck down the condition as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, finding it arbitrary and lacking statutory foundation, thereby allowing redevelopment without membership composition restrictions.

25 Aug 2021

The petitioners, members of Sangam Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged a condition imposed by the Social Justice and Special Assistance Depar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Municipal Corporation for Issuance of TDR Certificates. Transfer of Development Rights must be granted in accordance with Development Control Regulations and cannot be arbitrarily denied.

19 Aug 2019

The petitioners in these four writ petitions are owners of lands that were acquired by the Amravati Municipal Corporation for the construction of a ro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

3 May 2018

The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Levy on TDR/FSI Transfers by Builders Association. Transferable Development Rights (TDR) and Floor Space Index (FSI) are 'goods' under Article 366(12) of the Constitution and subject to GST as a supply under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

10 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Builders Association of Navi Mumbai and Neelsidhi Realties, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Monitoring Committee's Order in Mukesh Mills Redevelopment Case — CRZ-II Zoning and Development Control Regulations Apply to Textile Mill Land.

21 Oct 2013

The petitioners, M/s TCI Industries Ltd and its Executive Director, owned a large property in Colaba, Mumbai, known as Mukesh Mills, a former cotton t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

11 Dec 2006

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)