Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Time Bound Promotion Scheme"

500 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 500 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Career Progression Schemes. Employees Governed by Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, 2009 Retrospectively as Eligibility Under Assured Career Progression Scheme, 1999 Does Not Create Vested Right.

24 Mar 2022

The dispute arose between the Union of India and its employees regarding the applicable career progression scheme. The employees, working as Junior En...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards for Reservation in Promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution. The Court Held That There Is No Fixed Yardstick for Quantifiable Data Showing Inadequacy of Representation, and the State Must Collect Data Based on Cadre as the Unit, with Sampling Methods Permissible, While Affirming the Prospective Operation of M. Nagaraj v. Union of India.

28 Jan 2022

The judgment arose from a batch of cases challenging reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Eligibility Certificate for Tax Incentives Under New Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. The court held that the government is bound by its promise of incentives under the scheme and cannot arbitrarily deny benefits once the Eligibility Certificate is issued.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s K. M. Refineries and Infraspace Pvt. Ltd., a registered company manufacturing vegetable oil and allied products, set up a factory ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Decision Striking Down Clarification Excluding Retired Employees from Revised ACP Scheme. The Court held that the clarification dated 1.7.2011, which sought to deny the benefit of the Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme to employees who retired between 1.10.2006 and 31.3.2010, was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

20 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra formulated a Revised Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme, notified via Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 1.4.2010, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Striking Down Clarification Excluding Retired Employees from Revised ACPS. Clarification Excluding Employees Who Retired Between 1.10.2006 and 31.3.2010 from Retrospective Benefit of Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14.

24 Jul 2017

The State of Maharashtra formulated a Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) vide Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 1.4.2010, which was mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Animal Husbandry Department Against Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right Earned by Service, and Denial Without Proper Justification Is Arbitrary.

9 Dec 2016

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the Commissioner of Animal Husbandry, Maharashtra, and other officers (petitioners) against three retir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order in Seniority Dispute Under MEPS Rules — Petitioner's Continuous Service from 1983 Upheld Over Respondent's Later Appointment. Seniority Determined by Date of Continuous Appointment in Clear Permanent Vacancy, Not by Date of Approval Under Rule 12 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

6 May 2016

The petitioner, Mrs. Vidyalata Nilkanth Patil, was appointed as an assistant teacher in the respondent no.2 school on 4th July, 1983 in a clear and pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

22 Jan 2015

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

1 Jan 1970

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)