Search Results for "Technical and Supervisory staff"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Bajaj Electricals Ltd, Upholds Closure of Diecasting Division as Genuine. Industrial Court's finding of functional integrality between diecasting and fan divisions reversed; closure held valid under Section 25O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Bajaj Electricals Limited, had a factory at Chakan, Pune, comprising two divisions: a diecasting division and a fan division. The diec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...