Search Results for "Tax adjustment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Tax adjustment"

323 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Replacement of Machinery and Depreciation Issues Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure on Replacement of Entire Machinery is Capital Expenditure; IFCI Adjustment Not Actual Payment Under Section 43AB; Full Depreciation on Dumpers Requires Evidence of Use.

22 Jan 2025

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, dated 26.12...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging TDS Deduction on Land Acquisition Compensation — Holds That KIADB Is Not a 'Public Sector Company' Under Section 194LA of Income Tax Act, 1961. Statutory Board Cannot Deduct TDS on Compensation Paid for Land Acquisition as It Is Not a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act.

2 Aug 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Hegde and Golay Pvt Ltd, a company whose land was acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for a metro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.

4 Nov 2020

The case arises from an application for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor son under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The wife left the matrimonial ho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

13 Mar 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

16 Jun 2016

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Sales Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Appeal as Not Maintainable. The order levying penalty for the first time by the appellate Deputy Commissioner under Section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with Section 36(3)(d) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is an original order under Section 36, and the appeal against it is a second appeal under Section 55 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

25 Feb 2010

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (BST Act) by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of TDS Refund Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Establish That Payments to Foreign Collaborator Were Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) Read with DTAA.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, M/s BASF (India) Limited and Mr. P.A. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February 2001 passed by the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Reference Under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Profits on Sale of Machinery Not Taxable Under Section 41(2) as Depreciation Was Claimed by Dissolved Firm, Not by Assessee.

21 Jul 2005

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the opinion of the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)