Search Results for "Suo motu extension"

218 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Corrigendum to Award Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Original Award

The petitioners, Karuppiah Mahalingam and others, had availed a loan against mortgaged property from Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited. They defaulted on re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...