Search Results for "Summary suit"

1606 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1606 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment for Recovery of Price of Goods Sold and Delivered Under Order XXXVII CPC — Defendant Fails to File Reply to Summons for Judgment. Interest Reduced from 18% to 12% per annum as Court Exercises Discretion Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(a) CPC.

The plaintiff, Chandur Moriani, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Vinod Gada, for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Sub-Contractor for Unpaid Construction Work. Court holds that defendant's denial of liability is not bona fide and raises no triable issue under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The plaintiff, Jolly Constructions, a registered partnership firm acting as a sub-contractor, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Partnership Firm in Suit for Recovery of Outstanding Amounts Under Order XXXVII CPC. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Rejected Due to Lack of Triable Issues and Failure to Disclose Substantial Defense.

The plaintiff, Harilal & Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed Summary Suit No.3037 of 2007 in the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit. Defendant Failed to Disclose Triable Issue or Bona Fide Defence Under Order 37 CPC.

This Civil Revision Application was filed by the original respondent (defendant) against an order dated 23rd July 2009 passed by the learned Judge of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Amount. Condition of depositing Rs. 2,50,000/- was set aside as onerous and not warranted where defendant had raised triable issues and admitted part of the claim.

The petitioner, Smita Yashwant Lipte, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, in Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Decree for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Suit for Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Against Defendants Who Dispossessed Plaintiff Without Title.

The petitioners, original defendants, challenged a decree dated 18th May 1998 passed by the trial court under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 19...