Search Results for "Special Meeting"

3093 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3093 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Caste Validity Certificate Issue Not Decided by Competent Authority, No Right to Speak in No-Confidence Meeting.

The petitioner, Yogini w/o Sanjay Deshmukh, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mandawa. A no-confidence motion was initiated against her, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.

Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Adhyaksha of Grama Panchayat; Rule 3(7) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence) Rules, 1994, Prohibits Debate, and Non-Recording of Reasons Does Not Vitiate the Proceedings.

The petitioner, Smt. Gangambike, had been elected as a member of Koppa Grama Panchayat, Piriyapatna Taluk, on 17 May 2010, and subsequently as Adhyaks...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Delegate Nomination Dispute in Karnataka Milk Federation; Interim Order Allows Petitioner to Cast Sealed Vote. Challenge to Regional Commissioner's Authority Under Section 28-A(4-B) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The writ petitions concerned a dispute over the nomination of a delegate to the apex milk co-operative federation in Karnataka. The petitioner was a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...