Search Results for "Shakti Mills"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition in Service Law Dispute Over Group Classification. The court upheld the MAT's declaration that Group 'C' employees are immune from the Revenue Division Allotment Rules, 2015, which apply only to Group 'A' and 'B' posts.

The case involves a challenge by the Director of Accounts and Treasuries (M.S.), Mumbai and others (petitioners) against a judgment of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery. Limitation Period for Suit Based on Oral Agreement Runs from Date of Refusal to Pay, Not from Date of Knowledge of Sale Deeds.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (applicants) challenging the order of the trial court rejecting their applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law Not Decided at Threshold. Plaint Averments Show Cause of Action Arose in 2010, Suit Filed Within Three Years, Not Barred by Limitation.

The applicants (original defendants) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 43B Explanation 3C. Interest Converted into Debentures Not Deemed Actually Paid as Per Retrospective Amendment, Disallowing Deduction Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an appeal by M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III, concerning the interpretation of Se...