Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2506 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consolidation Dispute, Restores Equitable Allocation of Chak on Pitch Road to All Cosharers. The Court held that until a holding is partitioned under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950, every cosharer has a right to a chak on the road frontage, and the High Court erred in interfering with the equitable orders of the Settlement Officer and Deputy Director of Consolidation.

9 Jan 2019

The appellant, Hansraj, was the original Bhumidhar of Plot No.677 in Village Bahria, District Basti, along with his brother Bansraj. Bansraj sold his ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Pass Award in Terms of Settlement in Industrial Dispute. Industrial Tribunal directed to consider whether settlement is fair, legal and proper before rejecting application.

1 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Paranjape Metal Shapers Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31st December 2009 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in pending Reference...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Return of Plaint in Co-operative Dispute Over OTS. Guarantor's Dispute Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Held Not Maintainable After Issuance of Recovery Certificate Under Section 101.

13 Jan 2022

The petitioners, Mr. Sadanand Belvalkar and another, were guarantors to a loan sanctioned by Vidya Sahakari Bank Limited (respondent no. 2) to M/s Mbe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 420 and 471 IPC Following Settlement of Loan Account Approved by Debts Recovery Tribunal — Criminal proceedings cannot continue after compromise of civil debt where no element of cheating from inception exists.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by Vijay Kumar Kela and his proprietary firm against an order of the Chhattisgarh High Court refusing to quash criminal pr...

High Court

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues.

9 Jul 2024

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this ref...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Excessive Interest Charged Under Section 234B of Income Tax Act, 1961 Beyond Settlement Commission Order Date. Interest under Section 234B cannot be charged beyond the date of the Settlement Commission order under Section 245D of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

4 Sep 2017

The petitioner, M/s Hotel Hamilton Complex, a partnership firm represented by its Managing Partner Sri M.C.Mohammed Yahya, filed writ petitions under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Family Settlement Admissibility Case - Unregistered Kharurunama and Receipt Admissible as Corroborative Evidence. The Court held that if a family settlement document merely records a pre-existing oral agreement, it does not require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 and can be used as evidence for collateral purposes, remanding the matter for trial court determination.

1 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, concerning the admissibility of an unregistered family settleme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

17 Jan 2018

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sherif...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Under Section 32(3) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Deputy Director Lacked Jurisdiction to Reopen Final Consolidation Scheme After 30 Years. The court held that once a certificate under Section 22 is issued, the scheme attains finality and cannot be reopened under Section 32(3) except for clerical errors.

13 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Padmabai Narayan Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Au...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)