Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman Retrenched Due to Computerization. Introduction of computers does not constitute a valid ground for retrenchment without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging a common award of the Labour Court dated 19th September 2002. The workman, Mohammed Asad Khan,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Workman Dismissed Without Enquiry. Termination of Mechanic Labour by Cement Factory Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Absence of Enquiry.

The petitioner, Yenkappa, was employed as a Mechanic Labour by the respondent, Rajashree Cements Factory, in lieu of land acquired from him. He was te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Continuity of Service but Without Back Wages. Daily Wage Worker's Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Chandrakant Prabhakar Jadhav, was a daily wage worker appointed by the State of Maharashtra (Public Works Division) on 1 July 1984. He ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman's Petition in Industrial Dispute Challenging Termination and Denial of Back Wages. Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Full Back Wages Granted as Employer Failed to Prove Gainful Employment.

The petitioner, a workman employed by the Union of India through the Controller of Quality Assurance (Vehicles), Ministry of Defence, challenged his t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement Orders for Daily-Wage Employees. Termination of daily-wage employees without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, and reinstatement with back wages is proper remedy.

The case involves four writ petitions arising from service disputes between the Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board (the employer) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Labour Court Order Reinstating Workman with Back Wages in BSNL Termination Dispute. Termination of a casual labourer with temporary status without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal and unjustified.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition No.1721/2011 was filed by the Ge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...