Search Results for "Section 230 Companies Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 230 Companies Act"

240 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Stamp Duty Assessment on NCLT Order Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 -- Petitioner Challenges Rs. 50,00,000 Duty on Amalgamation Scheme Instrument

18 Feb 2026

The High Court heard a writ petition by Petitioner. challenging stamp duty assessment of Rs. 50,00,000 on an NCLT Mumbai order sanctioning a composite...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

22 Jan 2026

The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Director's Rejection of Amalgamation Scheme Under Section 233 Companies Act — Regional Director Lacks Power to Reject, Must File Application Before NCLT if Scheme Not in Public Interest. The court held that the Regional Director's order rejecting the scheme on grounds of insolvency was without jurisdiction as the proper remedy under Section 233(5) is to approach the NCLT.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioners, five companies with common directors and shareholders, sought to amalgamate petitioner nos. 2 to 5 (wholly-owned subsidiaries) with p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Notification – Not mentioned. Petitioners, including industry associations and companies, challenged notification dated 27.12.2016 issued by the Labour Department on grounds of unconstitutionality and violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

29 Mar 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.

8 May 2014

The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)