Search Results for "Section 222 CrPC"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against University Vice-Chancellor in SC/ST Act Case - Termination of Lecturer Does Not Constitute Caste-Based Atrocity or Defamation - Criminal Proceedings Deemed Counter-Blast Litigation and Abuse of Process

The High Court of Karnataka allowed a criminal petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against Vice-Chancellor of Bengaluru North University, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.1 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Recovery. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 302, 120-B, 201 read with 34 IPC.

The petitioner, Sri Punitha, accused No.1 in Crime No.222/2019 registered by Harohalli Police Station for offences under Sections 302, 120-B, 201 read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Holds Accused Cannot Cross-Examine Approver at Pre-Committal Stage Under Section 306(4) CrPC. The right to cross-examine the approver arises only after committal to the Court of Sessions, as the examination under Section 306(4) is for committal purposes only.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which allowed the respondents (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Drop Witnesses and Array Them as Accused in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case. Court Holds That Power Under Section 319 CrPC Is Discretionary and Cannot Be Invoked by an Accused at Trial Stage Without Evidence.

The applicant, a senior IPS officer and accused No. 2 in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...