Search Results for "Section 22-A"

99 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurance Company Liable for Death of Employee in Motor Vehicle Accident. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Through Consistent Employment and Wages, Making Employer Liable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company challenging the judgment and award dated 23.01.2017 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Goa Rent Control Act. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment and Subletting Justify Eviction Under Sections 22(a) and 22(b)(i) and (ii) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased tenant Gurudas Narayan Salgaonkar, challenged an order dated 03/01/2014 passed by the Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Garden and Playground in Development Plan. Land Reserved Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Delay or Change of Purpose Once Acquisition Proceedings Are Initiated.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Abhijit Chandrakant Chaunda and Chandrashekhar Mallikarjunappa Bidve challenging the acquisition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...