Search Results for "Rule 273"

628 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 628 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Police Officers for Alleged Violation of Arnesh Kumar Guidelines. Court holds that non-compliance with Section 41A CrPC guidelines does not automatically constitute contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Aleixo Arnolfo Pereira, filed a contempt petition under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against two police officers ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...