Search Results for "Rule 27(1)"

577 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 577 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Draft Assessment Order in Faceless Assessment Scheme for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Petitioner's Objections Not Considered and No Personal Hearing Granted Despite Request Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Piramal Enterprises Limited, a registered company engaged in pharmaceutical manufacturing and trading, filed its original return of in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition on Police Assistance for Injunction Implementation — Trial Court's Direction Under Section 151 CPC Challenged for Res Judicata and Possession Violations

The writ petition arose from a civil suit (O.S. No. 1708/2024) filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the petitioners-defendants seeking a declarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...