Search Results for "Rule 222"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 222"

658 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

5 Feb 2024

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Prima Facie Upholds Plaintiff’s Patent and Finds Infringement by Defendant in Transformer Explosion Prevention Technology Case; Interim Injunction Issued. Court Rejects Defendant’s Arguments on Invalidity and Defences, Holding That a Strong Prima Facie Case Exists Under the Patents Act, 1970.

23 Oct 2015

The dispute involved a claim of patent infringement concerning a system and method for preventing and detecting explosion and fire in electrical trans...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

20 Oct 2020

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Damages and Injunction — Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. The court held that the plaint as a whole must be considered and that the legal notice sent by the plaintiffs to the defendants was part of the plaint averments indicating a cause of action.

15 Jun 2023

The revision petition was filed by the defendants (petitioners) challenging the order dated 14.03.2023 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

19 Jul 2026

This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions Against Respondent — Disputed Debt and Bona Fide Defence Preclude Admission. The court held that a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be admitted when the debt is bona fide disputed and the company has a substantial defence, as the remedy is not for recovery of debt but for insolvency.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner,  filed two winding up petitions under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Respondent., seeking winding up on ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)