Search Results for "Rule 168"

503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Reduces Interest Rate in Motor Accident Claim. Claimant's compensation of Rs.19,08,550 upheld but interest reduced from 9% to 7.5% per annum under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2011 when the claimant, a pedestrian, was hit by a tanker bearing registration No. GJ-6-V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Resolving Complexities in a Civil Suit for Partition. Limitation Issues, Res Judicata, and Legislative Amendments in Judicial Proceedings.

The legal dispute involving a civil suit for partition and related claims, focusing on the issue of limitation under Section 9-A of the CPC. It explor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Official Secrets Act for Taking Photo of Complaint at Police Station. Petitioner's act of photographing a complaint filed against him does not constitute spying or disclosing secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

The petitioner, Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Short Delivery Case. Railway Claims Tribunal's Award of Compensation for Short Delivery of B.P. Sheets Upheld as Appellant Failed to Prove Absence of Negligence Under Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment and order dated 3.6.1996 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal in Case No. OC 9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 354 IPC for Lack of Criminal Intent in Workplace Incident. Touching of hands by Headmaster to discuss pending bills does not constitute assault or criminal force with intent to outrage modesty under Section 354 IPC.

The applicant, Dilip Uttam Lomate, was the Headmaster of an Ashram School. The respondent No.2, Vaishali Patil, was an Assistant Teacher. She alleged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Family Members Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry in Partition of Hindu Undivided Family Land. Third Party Without Locus Standi Cannot Oppose Mutation Entry Among Family Members.

The petitioners, Manikchand Hiralal Nahar and his two sons, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Collector, Beed, which set a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Correct Inadvertent Omissions in Civil Suit. Petitioners' Application for Amendment Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Allowed as Omissions Were Formal and Did Not Change the Tenor of the Written Statement.

The petitioners, defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 168 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 12.08.2014 passed by the trial co...