KAHC010364002010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Road Line Sanction"
683 result(s) found
Found 683 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Land Owner's Right to Insist on Acquisition under Section 126 MRTP Act After Town Planning Scheme Reservation. The Court frames the legal issue regarding the interrelationship between Chapters V and VII of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 in the context of land reserved for public purposes.
1 Aug 2026The appeal arose from a dispute regarding a plot of land reserved for Municipal Office in a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and To...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.
27 Feb 2019The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.
11 Jun 2024The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...
- 513
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.
7 Apr 2016The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Development of Surrendered Land After Reservation Lapses — Revocation of Permission by Municipal Council Held Illegal. The court held that once a reservation lapses, the land reverts to the owner and any subsequent surrender is voluntary, and the Municipal Council cannot revoke permission granted on such surrender.
6 Jul 2006The petitioners, owners of Field Survey Nos. 96/3 and 98/2 in Khamgaon, sought to develop open spaces after surrendering land for a 60 ft. wide D.P. R...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Companies Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 447 of Companies Act, 2013. Complaint Filed Without Prior Approval of Central Government or Authorized Body as Required Under Section 439 of Companies Act, 2013, Rendering Proceedings Invalid.
26 Nov 2015The judgment pertains to a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by ten petitioners who were dir...
- 47
High Court
High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.
24 Apr 2006The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cross-Complaints for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Dispute Between Business Partners Over Alleged Theft and Assault Cannot Proceed Without Prior Sanction as Complainants Were Public Servants Acting in Discharge of Official Duty.
5 Feb 2018The judgment involves three interconnected criminal applications arising from cross-complaints between two groups. The applicants in Cri.Appln.2544/20...
- 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.
23 Nov 2021The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...
- 323
