Search Results for "Residential premises"

1178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree on Ground of Unauthorized Subletting in Small Causes Court Appeal. Tenant's claim of club membership occupancy fails as evidence shows exclusive possession by third parties without landlord's consent.

The petitioner, Louis Lobo, was the defendant in a rent suit filed by the original plaintiffs, Mohamed Yusuf Moosa and subsequently Parasmal Keshrimal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlords' Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Danger to Tenanted Portions. Eviction Decrees Set Aside as Municipal Demolition Notice and Other Grounds Under Sections 15 and 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Were Not Satisfactorily Proven.

The dispute involved landlords appealing against a Bombay High Court judgment that invalidated eviction decrees against two tenants under the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...