Search Results for "Referral Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Referral Court"

252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

1 Jan 2026

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Referring Dispute to Arbitration in Commercial Suit — Arbitration Agreement Not Duly Signed by Plaintiff. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires existence of valid arbitration agreement; mere reference in invoices insufficient.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Tusker Workspace Pvt. Ltd., filed a commercial suit (Com. O.S. No.207/2024) before the LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Proviso to Clause 53 of Statute 24 Is Not Attracted When Employee Is Terminated for Willful Neglect of Duty or Misconduct Covered by Clauses (a) and (b) of Schedule A of Ordinance 6 of College Code. The requirement of prior approval under the proviso applies only to termination simpliciter, not to termination for misconduct under the specified clauses.

20 Feb 2023

The case involves a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur regarding the interpretation of the proviso to Clause 53 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cantonment Board's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute. Limitation period for Section 11 application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from date of refusal to appoint arbitrator, not from request date, under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and no claim certificate does not extinguish arbitration clause.

15 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from three contracts dated 23.09.2000 and 17.09.2001 between Secunderabad Cantonment Board (appellant) and M/s B. Ramachandraiah & S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Maharashtra Police Act — Clarifies Conditions for Section 56(1)(a) and (b) and Requirement of Witness Fear. The court held that each clause has distinct requirements and the authority must apply mind to proportionality and natural justice.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — Emphasizes Need for Application of Mind and Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem. Court Holds That Externment Orders Must Be Based on Subjective Satisfaction of the Authority and Not Be Excessive or Arbitrary.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment arises from three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates referral when arbitration agreement exists and subject matter is arbitrable.

20 Mar 2018

The Petitioner, Suman Baburao Thapa, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.566 of 2011 filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jigar K. Mehta and Anand ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order to Shift Liquor Shop Due to Proximity to Religious Institution. Rule 5(1) of Karnataka Excise Licences (General Conditions) Rules, 1967 prohibits liquor vending within 100 meters of religious or educational institutions.

8 Jun 2016

The petitioner, S. Gopal, a CL-9 licensee for vending liquor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Sep 2014

The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compensation for Defective Cotton Seeds — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal When Defect Not Disputed. Compensation Upheld but Interest Reduced from 24% to 12% Under Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009 and Rules, 2010.

11 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s Bayer Bio Science Private Limited, a seed manufacturing company, challenged an order dated 29 December 2011 passed by the Commissi...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)