Search Results for "Recruitment Rules"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employee's Appeal in Employment Contract Dispute Over Overseas Deputation Clause. The Court held that a business visit does not constitute deputation under the contract as deputation requires a tripartite consensual agreement and written evidence, which was lacking.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in a second appeal, concerning a dispute over an employment contract clause rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Recruitment Selection Challenge. Review jurisdiction not exercised as petitioners failed to establish sufficient grounds regarding alleged non-compliance with percentage criteria in selection process under Uttar Pradesh Government recruitment rules.

The Supreme Court considered a review petition arising from its earlier order dated 26.07.2021 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11323 of 2021. The...