Search Results for "RFCTLARR Act"

71 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Violation of Mandatory 30-Day Notice Period Under Section 21(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Failure to Provide Minimum Notice and Personal Hearing Vitiates the Award Despite Filing of Objections.

The petitioners, Shree Nasik Panchavati Panjrapole and its trustees, challenged the land acquisition award dated 23 November 2023 passed by the Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowner's Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Delay in Final Notification Under Section 11(7) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Preliminary Notification Deemed Rescinded as Final Notification Not Issued Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Sri K. Ganganna, owned lands that were acquired by the respondents for the Indian Railways. A preliminary notification under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal, Quashes High Court Order Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition, Overruling Manav Dharma Trust

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by Narendra Kumar Jain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Deemed Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Payment of Compensation or Non-Taking of Possession.

The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of land acquired under a notification dated 24.06.1986 issued under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Deemed Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Payment of Compensation or Non-Taking of Possession.

The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of land acquired under a notification dated 24.06.1986 issued under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Railway Encroachment on Private Land Without Acquisition. Petitioner's land used for railway line without acquisition proceedings; court orders compensation under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

The petitioner, Sumit S/o Ashokkumar Bharadiya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad alleging that the Railway Authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation for Land at Thippasandra Village.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge which held that the acquisition proceedings in respect o...