Search Results for "Principal Director Competence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Principal Director Competence"

324 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.

1 Aug 2026

The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

1 Aug 2026

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

24 Apr 2024

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Independent Arbitrator in Perkins Eastman v. HSCC Dispute — Clause 24 Arbitration Mechanism Invalid Due to Lack of Impartiality. The Court held that a person ineligible to act as arbitrator cannot appoint an arbitrator, relying on TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Limited.

29 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court considered an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the App...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Appointing Substitute Arbitrator in Contract Dispute. Court Holds That High Court Erred in Terminating Mandate of Arbitrator Appointed by Consent and in Deviating from Arbitration Clause Without Justification.

22 Jan 2019

The appellant, Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation Limited, invited tenders for handling and road transportation of ISO containers and cargo. The r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries Act, 2006 — Lottery Tickets Held to Be Goods Taxable Under State Sales Tax. Sub-distributor of Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland lotteries fails to prove Act ultra vires; court rules that sale of lottery tickets within Maharashtra is taxable under Entry 54 List II.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, a proprietor of Sri Mangal Murti Marketing, carrying on business as a sub-distributor of State-organized lotteries of Arunachal Prades...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 55 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and Quashing of Criminal Proceedings. Petition raises grounds of legislative competence, inconsistency with Indian Easements Act, 1882, and limitation under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 468.

19 Dec 2017

This criminal writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging D.Ed. Admission Eligibility Criteria — Upholds Requirement of Art Subject at HSC Level for D.Ed. Course. The court held that the condition of having studied Art at Higher Secondary Certificate (HSC) examination is a valid eligibility criterion for admission to Diploma in Education (D.Ed.) course, and the petitioners who did not possess such qualification are not entitled to admission.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by multiple petitioners challenging the eligibility criteria for admission to the Diploma in Educatio...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)