Search Results for "Premature Application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Premature Application"

1186 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1186 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Zilla Parishad Contract Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Due to Premature Filing Before Expiry of Statutory Notice Period. The court held that a suit filed before the expiry of the two-month notice period under Section 280 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 is premature and the period of notice cannot be excluded under Section 15(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 May 2005

The appellants, the Executive Engineer and Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, were original defendants in a suit filed by the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Time for Deposit in Specific Performance Decree. Trial Court's Discretion Under Section 148 CPC to Enlarge Time Upheld Despite Default Clause in Decree.

11 Aug 2016

The petitioners, M/s Armor's Developers Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 4-12-2015 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Sui...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

16 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Setting Aside of Specific Performance Decree—Expedited Hearing Ordered Despite Adjournment Requests. The appeal, admitted on questions of law, was treated as part-heard and oral judgment delivered after refusal to grant further time.

11 Mar 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur, heard Second Appeal No. 210/2013 arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Previous Arbitrator's Withdrawal Due to Ill Health

12 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two commercial arbitration applications filed by Applicants seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of th...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

17 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favor of Appellants.

30 Dec 2020

The appellants, who are the plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal against the order of the trial court rejecting their application for temporary inj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute Over Indemnity Timing Under Consent Award. The Court held that an indemnity clause in a consent award creates immediate obligations to protect against liability recovery, not deferred until final confirmation by the highest court of appeal, under Sections 124 and 125 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi that deferred the execution of a consent award dated 01.03.2019, rendered by the Singapore...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Remission Policies Under Article 161 and CrPC in State Appeal. The Court held that constitutional remission powers under Article 161 of the Constitution prevail over statutory policies under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and policies are statutory rules under the Prisons Act, 1894.

3 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from an order by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana regarding State Government policies on granting remission to prisoners. The Stat...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)