Search Results for "Plaint verification"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Filed by Newspaper Publisher Against Advertising Agency for Unpaid Bills. Court Decrees Suit for Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum.

The appellant, Kasturi and Sons Ltd., publisher of 'The Hindu' and other publications, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,03,322.50/- against the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Damages Suit. Section 125 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 does not bar civil suit for damages against co-operative society and its employees for acts outside the scope of the Act.

The petitioner, defendant No.3 (Branch Manager of Karnataka State Co-operative Consumer's Federation Ltd.), filed a Civil Revision Petition under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Court Holds That Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Is Not a Decree and Therefore Not Appealable Under Section 96 CPC, but a Revision Lies Under Section 115 CPC.

The petitioners, original defendants in a suit for partition and permanent injunction, challenged the order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.

The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Continuous Hostile Possession for Over 12 Years Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Will Execution. Plaintiff failed to examine attesting witnesses or produce evidence to prove due execution of Will under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Romeo Anacleto D'Souza, filed a testamentary petition seeking probate of the Will dated 26th May 1986 of his mother, Mrs Ermina Pinto D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 81(3) and Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Petition Lacked Material Facts and Proper Verification.

The petitioner, Sambhaji Laxmanrao Pawar, filed an election petition under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute — Technical Defect of Verification Cured. Amendment sought for correcting property description and challenging subsequent notice is allowed as no prejudice caused to other side.

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration that a notice dated 29th January 2008 issued by the first respondent (Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance. Amendment Seeking to Change Suit from Specific Performance to Declaration of Title and Possession Held Impermissible as It Introduces Inconsistent Case and Is Barred by Limitation.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.08.1994 executed by the predecessor-in-ti...