Search Results for "Pharmaceutical Trademark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Pharmaceutical Trademark"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

13 Jul 2026

The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007,...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

16 Mar 2026

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

18 Apr 2016

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Contract for Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products Held to be Sale, Not Works Contract Under Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the agreement between the assessee and the manufacturer was a contract for sale of goods, as property passed only on delivery and the agreement was on a principal-to-principal basis.

12 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

12 Jul 2010

The Plaintiffs, Arviva Industries (India) Ltd., filed a suit seeking an injunction against the Defendants, Vikas M. Tulsian and others, alleging infri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Restrains Defendant from Using Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda Mahalaxmi'. The Court modified the interim injunction to allow the defendant to use 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda' with a blue background, subject to an undertaking, while restraining the use of 'Mahalaxmi'.

3 Sep 2024

The present Commercial Appeal from Order was filed by the appellant (original defendant) challenging the judgment and order dated 17th February 2023 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion in Trademark Infringement Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiffs' claim for interim injunction rejected as they failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Lokhandwala Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent in Trademark Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Business Activities in Mumbai Confer Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case that part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this court, and the defendants failed to discharge the burden of proving that the leave was improperly granted.

12 Jul 2017

The plaintiff, M/s Black Ticket Films, a registered partnership firm based in New Delhi, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against two defendants ...

5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)