Search Results for "Pension Rules"

846 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 846 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Compulsorily Retired Employee Under Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002. Rejection of Compassionate Pension Solely on Ground of Serious Punishment Quashed for Non-Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Hitesh Balvantrai Kothari, was a government employee who was compulsorily retired from service on 26 August 2010 as a disciplinary pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Dearness Allowance on Regular Pension for Retired Employee Who Also Received Family Pension. Petitioner failed to establish non-payment of Dearness Allowance as records showed it was included in pension payment.

The petitioner, Tmt. P. Vanajakshi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, seeking a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Wife's Revision in Succession Certificate Dispute. Second Marriage During Subsistence of First Marriage Held Void Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Entitling First Wife to Family Pension.

The case involves a dispute between two widows of the deceased Gangadhar Hiremath regarding entitlement to a succession certificate and family pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in Freedom Fighters' Pension Case — Upholds Government Order Denying Pension Due to Lack of Proof of Participation. Court Holds That Pension Sanction Order Must Be Based on Documentary Evidence and Not on Conjectures.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the order of a learned Single Judge directing the release of freedom fighte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...