Search Results for "Ossification test"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Minority. Conviction under Section 363 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's age below 18 years and absence of inducement.

The appellant, Saleem @ Mahammedsaleem, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-II, Dharwad in S.C. No. 101/2011 for the offence under Section 363 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sunil Sable, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Dhule, for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Conviction for Employing Child Labour in Tailor Shop. Conviction under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 for employing two children below 14 years as helpers upheld.

The petitioner, Sri A M Samiulla, owned a tailor shop named 'Gents Select Tailors' in Gandhinagar, Bangalore. On 27 January 2006, the Senior Labour In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Head Constable for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Evidence of Victim and Medical Reports Proved Rape Without Consent and Victim's Age Below 16 Years Made Consent Irrelevant Under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a) and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of a head constable for kidnapping and raping a minor girl. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363 and 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years and That Taking Was Without Consent.

The appellants, Rohidas Laxman Malge and Vilas Sopanrao Landge, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 363 and 366 read with Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Tribal Girl Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 452, 506 IPC set aside as medical evidence and witness testimony failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok @ Bhaiyya s/o Magan Koli, was convicted by the trial court under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act...