Search Results for "Minimum qualifying marks"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Provisional Selection List in University Appointment Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster — Backlog Posts Must Be Filled in Accordance with Karnataka Reservation of Appointments or Posts (Amendment) Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Shri Venu S. A., challenged a provisional selection list dated 12-07-2023 issued by the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NEET for AYUSH Courses: Minimum Qualifying Marks Valid Under Section 22 of Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. All-India Entrance Examination for BAMS, BUMS, BSMS, BHMS and MD-Ayurveda Held Within Regulatory Powers.

The Supreme Court considered appeals and writ petitions challenging the validity of notifications issued by the Central Council of Indian Medicine and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of PhD Candidature Due to Non-Processing of Application. University's Failure to Consider Application Despite Payment of Fees and Calling for Interview Violates Article 14 and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Rahul s/o Upasrao Rohankar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a communication dated 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Police Constable Appointment Due to Lack of Merit in Selection Process. Petitioner failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in interview and was not entitled to grace marks for sports achievements.

The petitioner, Vijay Balbhim Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Teachers in Jalna District. Transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, were upheld as valid and not violative of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, 24 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Primary Teachers Against Transfer Orders — Violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Teachers Transfer Rules, 2024. Court Quashes Transfer Orders as Arbitrary and Contrary to Statutory Rules, Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioners, 21 primary teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Beed, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the respo...