Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Liability for Pre-Sale Property Tax Arrears After Sale of Property. Transferor Not Liable for Taxes Accruing After Transfer Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Vishal Laxman Sakhare, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which reversed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax by Husband/Father-in-Law. Holds That Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Does Not Impose Vicarious Liability for Spouse's Tax Default.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, allowed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process for Gram Panchayat. Court holds that election process once commenced cannot be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the remedy lies in election petition under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Sajid Majid Khan and Babarao Parashram Kandhare (in W.P. No. 3196/2016) and Shaikh Salim Shaikh Madar (in W.P. No. 3420/2016), filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Panchayat Member for Non-Disclosure of Property Tax Dues. Failure to disclose outstanding property tax dues and obtain no-dues certificate renders election void under Section 14(1)(j) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Shaukat Ali Mohd. Hussain, challenged the election of respondent No. 1, Shaikh Ayub, as a member of the village panchayat of Badnapur ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...