Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Leasing Government Land to Society Where He Was President and Trustee. Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Indirect Interest in Contract Leads to Disqualification.

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Village Waghunde (Khurd), filed an application under Section 14(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Liability for Pre-Sale Property Tax Arrears After Sale of Property. Transferor Not Liable for Taxes Accruing After Transfer Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Vishal Laxman Sakhare, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which reversed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Scheduled Areas in Palghar Municipal Council Limits. Court holds that notification under Municipalities Act prevails over earlier scheduled area declaration.

The petitioners, residents and members of Gram Panchayats of revenue villages Aliyali, Tembhode, Lokmanya Nagar, Vevoor, and Gholveera, filed a writ p...